	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nature vs nurture &#8211; MedClient.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.medclient.com/tag/nature-vs-nurture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.medclient.com</link>
	<description>Blog for consumers of health care and medical services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Economist&#8217;s Take on Nature vs. Nurture</title>
		<link>https://www.medclient.com/2011/04/21/economists-take-on-nature-vs-nurture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of illness on a society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics of health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature vs nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health care]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.medclient.com/?p=943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would economists focus on this age old debate of genetisists and social engineers? Could it be that perhaps they are starting to see the ubiquitous connection between the wellness of a society and wealth of it&#8217;s economy? The question of parenting has become of increasing interest to economists. At the American Economic Association’s annual [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.medclient.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Nature_vs_Nurture2.jpg"><img decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" src="https://www.medclient.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Nature_vs_Nurture2.jpg" alt="" title="Nature_vs_Nurture2" width="400" height="267" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-942" srcset="https://www.medclient.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Nature_vs_Nurture2.jpg 400w, https://www.medclient.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Nature_vs_Nurture2-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></a></p>
<p>Why would <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/16/nature-vs-nurture-as-seen-by-economists/">economists focus </a>on this age old debate of genetisists and social engineers?</p>
<p>Could it be that perhaps they are starting to see the ubiquitous connection between the wellness of a society and wealth of it&#8217;s economy?</p>
<blockquote><p>The question of parenting has become of increasing interest to economists. At the American Economic Association’s annual meeting in Denver this year, for example, there was a panel on the effect of mothers’ employment on their children, as well as household choices and child development. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.medclient.com @ 2026-06-03 20:27:22 by W3 Total Cache
-->