Author: Staff (Page 6 of 158)

      Pleasant surprises in store for Obamacare?

      May 28, 2013 /

      Here’s some welcomed good news from of all places California:

      Predictions of an Obamacare apocalypse seem a little less credible today, thanks to California.

      On Thursday, officials in that state offered the first detailed glimpse of what consumers buying health benefits on their own can expect to pay next year. And from the looks of things, these consumers will be getting a pretty good deal.

      Based on the premiums that insurers have submitted for final regulatory approval, the majority of Californians buying coverage on the state’s new insurance exchange will be paying less—in many cases, far less—than they would pay for equivalent coverage today. And while a minority will still end up writing bigger premium checks than they do now, even they won’t be paying outrageous amounts. Meanwhile, all of these consumers will have access to the kind of comprehensive benefits that are frequently unavaiable today, at any price, because of the way insurers try to avoid the old and the sick.

      Guys like Paul Krugman are heralding these new numbers.

      If these numbers play out in other states as well, we could see a surge of people getting more affordable health insurance coverage.

      General Health, Health Care Policy, Health Insurance

      Are health care costs starting to stabilize?

      May 7, 2013 /

      Health care costs are the biggest contributor to our long term deficits, and so this issue gets a ton of attention in Washington. President Obama has argued for years that simply bending the long term cost curve on health care will result in huge savings regarding government spending helping to reduce deficits. The trend may have already started.

      Health care spending growth has famously slowed over the past five years, significantly enough that the Congressional Budget Office recently revised its projections of Medicare and Medicaid spending over the coming decade downward by hundreds of billions of dollars.

      Now, research papers suggests the recent slowdown doesn’t just reflect temporary economic weakness, but also structural shifts in how health care is delivered and financed — possibly attributable to the Affordable Care Act — and thus might be a harbinger of a longer-term trend.

      If they’re right, and the trend continues, it means workers can expect higher wages and the country’s projected medium term deficits are significantly overstated, which in turn suggests lawmakers’ continuing obsession with the current budget deficit, and deficits over the coming decade, are misguided.

      One of the keys to Obamacare is to move our health care system away from fee for service care to health care delivery that takes a holistic approach where doctors and hospitals are paid for overall care and outcomes as opposed to more tests and procedures. It makes sense that this shift has started to decrease overall costs.

      General Health, Health Care Policy, Health Insurance

      Let doctors see health care costs

      April 24, 2013 /

      stacks of 100 bills

      Here’s a fascinating tidbit. When doctors know the cost of tests and procedures, it affects how often they will order them.

      We also know that patients will think twice when they have to pay even modest amounts for tests.

      This is all just further evidence that we need to change the way we do things if we’re ever going to reform our health care system and fix our long term budget issues.

      General Health, Health Care Policy

      Perverse incentives for hospital profits

      April 17, 2013 /

      hospital bed

      If you want to know one reason why our health care system is so screwed up, please read this article. It explains how hospitals often make more money when complications arise during surgery.

      Patients who suffer complications after surgery are lucrative for hospitals, which get paid more when they treat infections and other problems, according to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association today.

      In 2010, an unnamed, nonprofit 12-hospital chain in the southern U.S. was paid an average of $49,400 per person for treating surgery patients who have complications — more than double the $18,900 paid for patients who underwent only the initial surgery, according to an analysis by researchers from Harvard Medical School and elsewhere.

      Read the entire article for details on this problem. We need to alter these incentives and pay for health care that actually works. Incompetence and mistakes should not be rewarded.

      General Health, Health Care Policy, Health Insurance, Hospitals, Quality Control

      « Older posts Newer posts »

      © 2026 MedClient.com

      Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑